October 6, 2008
Topsy-Turvy Week Makes Case for Instant Runoff Voting to Fix
Broken System
When the right and the left agree more than the center, it
tells us it's time to fix our very broken
election system.
The sun didn't shine at midnight. Cats and dogs weren't lying
together. But it was a topsy turvy world
this week when progressives and freshman
right-wing congressmen were in close
agreement that the Bush/Pelosi/Reid bailout
was bad news.
The reasons may have differed – Republicans
opposed it because it was an affront to
their conservative values, verging on
socialism, and progressives opposed it
because it sold out Main Street for Wall
Street – but it has created an interesting
dynamic, one that is worthy of exploration.
If the opposite ends of the political
spectrum agree to disagree with the middle,
what does that tell us about the middle?
We know that not a single freshman
Republican voted in support of the bailout
bill. Yet even some of the most liberal
Democrats went with their party leadership
to pass it.
One thing that's clear is the Republicans
have lost control of their people, while the
Democrats had far more discipline. Since the
Republican Party has been so misguided
lately, that may be a good thing for them.
Of course with congressional ratings below
10 percent, perhaps the Dems could have used
some rebellion too. The vote certainly did
not help their popularity.
No, my enthusiasm for most of the
congressional Democrats has waned even
further than I thought possible. To me, they
sold out the average American with this
bailout and showed ever more of the same
spinelessness, jumping when George W. Bush
told them to jump, and being afraid and
panicked when instructed to do so.
Some progressive congressional stalwarts
stood up to the wave of panic – Dennis
Kucinich, Bernie Sanders, Russ Feingold –
but most caved and allowed the outrageous
450-page, pork-loaded bill pass, handing an
obscene gift to Bush.
More than ever, America needs to institute
term limits and new laws requiring equal
treatment for third parties and
instant runoff voting, which lets you pick
your first, second and third choices, and
requires a majority victory. If no one wins
on the first pass, then the candidate with
the least votes is dropped from the count
and the second choice of all voters who
voted for the dropped candidate is counted.
This way, voters can cast true protest votes
or vote for third-party candidates without
throwing away their vote.
The advantage incumbent members of Congress
now have is bad for democracy and bad for
America. We saw it here with this vote,
where all of Congress ignored the clear
message they received from 90 percent of
their constituents not to pass the bill.
By the way, I'd bet that Barack Obama and
John McCain cut a deal that they'd both
support the bill so neither could attack the
other on it.
Now we sit and wait. It won't be long.
Within a few days or weeks, we'll see more
banks failing. I doubt the $700 billion will
put a dent in or slow down the economic
crisis we're experiencing. Too bad we can't,
like we'd be able to do if there was instant
run-off voting, send a message to our
incumbent legislators that they truly let us
down. If we did have instant runoff voting,
I bet that message would have become a
landslide and a lot of incumbents either
wouldn't be coming back or would be coming
back quite chastened.
© 2008
North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission.
Read
more of Rob's work at
OpEd News.
Click here to talk to our writers and
editors about this column and others in our discussion forum.
To e-mail feedback
about this column,
click here. If you enjoy this writer's
work, please contact your local newspapers editors and ask them to carry
it.
This
is Column # RK006.
Request permission to publish here.