November 8, 2006
Challenge for Democrats: Renew Our Political System
The now-concluded elections were the fun part, at least for
everyone except perhaps the candidates themselves. The
Democrats have taken over the House, and perhaps the Senate.
Now comes the hard part, actually governing this complex,
dynamic country during a difficult period. Even more than
specific laws and long-needed oversight, this will require a
priority commitment to strengthening and maintaining the
integrity of our political system, which has taken such a
hit over the last six years.
Nancy Pelosi is famous for saying, “There’s nothing like
winning.” This has sometimes served as rationale for a very
partisan approach for dealing with issues and Republican
opponents. This was perhaps necessary during the wilderness
years. Now that they will have some people in Washington
actually listening to them, another strategy may be in
order.
The voters have asked for change in the way business is
being done. It’s up to the Democrats to show them they can
deliver. This can be demonstrated with Democrats’ initial
statements, the new Speaker’s appointments of committee
chairpersons and the entire tone of the party’s approach.
The temptations for revenge will be strong, but
statesmanship must prevail. The Democrats are now at least
co-guardians of our political system.
In the political arena everyone believes, or sounds like
they believe, that they know exactly what needs to be done.
Only if others would listen to their wisdom! It often gets
lost in the shuffle that, apart from getting one’s own
vision adopted, a primary job for everyone involved in the
governing process is to help make the political system work
in an effective way. If the system isn’t working, or isn’t
trusted by a sizable majority of the citizens, what good is
having one’s vision driving that system?
Even our very adversarial system of justice has an analogous
responsibility. Lawyers on both sides of a case, among
others, are considered “officers of the court”. This role
trumps their loyalty to client and case when situations
arise that require their support of the integrity of the
justice system as a whole. Perhaps our members of Congress
need to think of themselves as “officers of the Congress”.
Our planet is another human system. It is more fragile than
we thought. If we melt it, freeze it or poison it, it won’t
matter much which country is the greatest superpower, or
which party is in power in any single country. Our political
system – you know, the one that has kept our democracy
functioning for more than two hundred years – is another
example of a crucial human system.
To help them function and survive, human systems require
minimum common assumptions about its basic nature and
priorities and shared concepts for communication. They
require credible mechanisms for decision-making and
resolving differences. Healthy human systems recognize that
people need each other to achieve important objectives for
themselves. This interdependence keeps the whole together as
a whole. Some of these elements seem to have lost their
vitality in our own political system. It is now up to the
Democrats to show they can bring them back.
What specifically would this entail? One might be assembling
bi-partisan working groups to address major issues of the
day: immigration, Social Security, domestic security.
Another might be creating a receptive environment for the
ideas of the Baker-Hamilton Commission of Iraq, with a view
toward creating a bi-partisan exit strategy, to the extent
that is possible in the current emotional context. This was
not done well with Vietnam and the recriminations still
exist, 40 years later. Differences among Democrats can be a
moderating force in forging these strategies.
This is about tone as well as substance. It is about saying
and doing in ways that demonstrate an awareness of the
importance of the integrity of the larger system to us all,
and the value of all those that make it up – in our country,
and in the Congress. This is a time for high-mindedness and
statesmanship – showing limits where necessary, but always
in pursuit of the strongest possible results for our
political system and our country.
If nothing else works to motivate the Democrats in this
noble direction, there’s always thinking of these two years
as an audition for the big prize of 2008.
To offer
feedback on this column,
click here.