September
3, 2007
The World
Against Michael Vick: Keeping Our Sports & Consciences Clean
Like most
people I was disgusted and angry at the recent revelations
of the dog-fighting avocation of NFL quarterback Michael
Vick. I’m a dog fanatic myself. Chulo, our 12-year-old
black-lab-and-something mix, has been the center of our
lives. My canine-phyllic sensibilities had not been so
violated since witnessing the caged dogs in the food
section of a Guangzhou, China market several years ago.
Apparently, pit bulls were used for the often-lethal combat
sport, and sometimes killed afterward in painful ways if
they didn’t perform to the organizers’ expectations. It
brings back echoes of the Iraqi Olympics under Uday Hussein.
The treatment of those poor creatures makes me angry and
sick.
I do,
however, see distortion in the public reaction.
The
outrage suggests a qualitatively different level of cruelty
from other “sporting” activities in which animals are maimed
or killed – hunting, for example. Or for that matter, the
killing of animals to make available most of the protein we
consume every day. What if a famous athlete was found
investing in a hog farm in Iowa? What a scandal!
Imagine
the horrific reaction to a ”sporting” activity in which
defenseless birds were caged, swung, let out and then killed
with a shotgun, with a margin of error that would make this
boring at the Perkins School for the Blind. At least Michael
Vick didn’t shoot any of his friends. The Perkins hunters
would have been listening for human breathing before they
let loose, unlike Vice President Cheney.
Other
examples of this double standard exist. Bullfighting is an
easy target, though practiced by foreigners that many prefer
not even be allowed into this country. Cockfighting still
exists, albeit without celebrity sponsors, and so is
generally under the radar.
Ethical
issues aside, there are political elements here – beginning
with the victims. Some animals are more valued than others
by people who make the rules. If the Cantonese were in
charge, they might only make sure the canine victim’s
carcasses were put to good use. If you drive in India, you’d
better not hit a cow, much less eat one. If it’s a Muslim
area, you won’t find people eating pork. I want to start an
advocacy group for the poor Indian lambs – who have no
religion protecting them from slaughter.
The most
important political element concerns who is performing the
awful deeds, and who is being offended. Dog fighting is an
activity of the lower classes. No vice presidents need
apply. Highly paid sports celebrities are supposed to leave
behind their former haunts and friends and become one of
“us”. Apparently, Michael didn’t do that.
The sky
falls much harder on transgressing celebrities – organizing
deadly dog fights, screaming anti-Semitic epithets at
police, etc. Unfair? I don’t buy it. Celebrities, in most
cases, choose their celebrity, and are paid a lot of for
their trouble. By the way, if writing this column ever
creates the possibility of propelling me into celebrity
status, I want out. (I‘m not too concerned.)
Some black
leaders are seeing racism, if not in the charges themselves,
then in the outrage and enthusiasm in their pursuit. Though
class snobbery is evident, it’s difficult for me to see the
racism here, though I recognize limitations in my white,
middle class perspective. I even thought O.J. was guilty.
Even I can
see one example. Some perceive anger from the white world at
a black man with the opportunity for this level of fame and
fortune flippantly throwing it all away, as in “ungrateful”.
It’s a good point. We’re not hearing similar
characterizations of a tall, limited white guy from the
Northwest throwing away a long Senate career as a result of
strange behavior in a gay-frequented men’s room in
Minneapolis – only Republican panic.
My point
is certainly not intended to lessen our disgust at this
practice, or other such depraved activities, especially if
perpetrators are in a position to influence young people
because of their role model status – heaven help us.
Celebrities have a special responsibility. Someone needs to
explain that to them early on. Perhaps we need a celebrity
orientation program.
When faced
by this kind of horrible act, we need to slow down and take
in the big picture. Our resulting insights may not affect
charges, trial or sentence. But let’s remember glass houses
and stones, and keep the moral outrage in perspective, as we
ponder our own transgressions and the good fortune that we
don’t have a whole society coming down on top of us for each
one of them.