Why I might help occupy Detroit
After initially getting big play on liberal websites and almost nowhere else, the Occupy Wall Street movement is finally getting attention from the mainstream media – which is what its organizers wanted. Good for them, right? Not really.
When Oscar Wilde said “the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about,” he could not have known about today’s cable news, talk radio and social media. These days, when those doing the talking misrepresent and mock you in front of a national audience, that’s a problem. And, oh boy… OWS, which is just now getting started in metro Detroit, has trouble on its hands.
Fox News, predictably, has been apoplectic. Sean Hannity recently had Ann Coulter on his show to talk about “the destructive Occupy Wall Street protests.” Coulter, true to form, was more than happy to describe OWS as a “classic mob uprising.”
Rush Limbaugh has not given the protesters even that much credit. “Parasites” is a word he has used to describe them. Recently, CNN’s Alison Kosik used her Twitter feed to describe the purpose of OWS as “bang on the bongos, smoke weed.”
To some extent, this isn’t entirely the fault of the media. I have been part of enough liberal protests to know they can attract some colorful people. Aging hippies still exist and, God love ‘em, you will find them at events like this. Almost invariably, somebody will show up to sell communist newspapers. Bongos really might be part of the festivities. If that’s all you see (or all you are looking for) when you arrive, it can leave a bad impression.
Look beyond the surface, though, and it’s clear that OWS (aka the 99 percent movement) is about a lot more than bongos, weed and the latest edition of Worker’s Vanguard. It’s about pain and insecurity. It’s about disappointment. It’s about people who were wiped out because they were laid off in middle age or got sick and lost health insurance. It’s not a joke. Any policymaker or politician who treats it that way does so at his or her own career peril.
Presidential hopeful Herman Cain, in particular, does not get that. “I don’t have the facts to back this up,” he told the Wall Street Journal, “but I happen to believe that these demonstrations are planned and orchestrated to distract from the failed policies of the Obama Administration.”
He then went on to accuse the protesters of being just a bunch of complainers. His advice to the protesters was “blame yourself” for not being rich or for being unemployed. “It’s not someone’s fault if they succeeded,” Cain said, so resenting them doesn’t help anyone. That is true, and Cain would have a point if unfocused, primeval envy of the rich was a key motivator among OWA protestors. Based on statements I have read on OWA-connected websites, it isn’t.
Like most Americans, what grinds their gears isn’t wealth – it’s the scheming, fraud and manipulation of the system some people use to get it. In the case of Wall Street executives, the problem is not that they are rich – it’s how they got rich. More than that, it’s about how they managed to stay rich after their recklessness crashed the economy in 2008. So, yes, OWA folks resent some specific rich people. But that does not make them class warriors.
They also are not bunch of stupid, lazy, welfare-sucking losers. Largely, they are people who have gotten an education, worked hard and did their jobs before having the rug pulled out from under them. The last thing they want is a welfare check or endless extensions of unemployment benefits. They want to work and they want their work to be valued. They want their dignity back.
Cain wants the OWS protestors to stop complaining and help themselves. Well, with all due respect, Mr. Cain. I think that is what they are doing. They are getting organized. They are sharing ideas. They are, maybe, becoming a political force to be reckoned with.
I don’t know what will come of these protests. But I know where those folks are coming from. I have been where they are and I know how it feels. For that reason, I’m going to spend some time hanging with the OWS crowd, just to find out more. If Mr. Cain would like to join me, that would be great.
No one will take on Obama, and the Washington establishment, like Newt Gingrich
Fantastic: Obama would like to replicate Detroit’s foibles elsewhere
New York Times scandalized as NYPD is trained on Muslim-perpetrated violence
Detroit boldly choosing to crackdown on the innocent
South Carolina stopped Romney. For now
Cartoon: Down and out
In which I praise Mitt (but explain why I won’t vote for him)
Bernero the gambler sells Main Street for a shot at the slots
The Emergency Financial Manager law is undemocratic, but opponents need an alternative to guard against local fiscal calamities
Memo to Snyder: Don’t stop the radical reforms now!
Some…some of those protestors have valid points the problem is they’re protesting in the wrong place. It’s government interference that cause corporate banks to do the incredibly stupid things they’ve done. Reinstate something similar to Glass Steagall and then get out of the way. Having Barny Frank and Chris Dodd forcing banks to make loans to people who shouldn’t have gotten them was as much to blame on this recession as anything.
The biggest problem is the simplest, You can’t spend more than you take in.
Once the govenment learns that, people will begin investing here again. No one wants to invest in a loser and that is what the US government and our country has become.
So I agree with you, protest; but know what you’re protesting about and do it in the right place
Conservatives have the Tea Party. Liberals have OWS….the Flea Party.
I am thinking the views expressed belong to Gary, the articles author. He has attempted to provide the OWS with loftier ideals in order to advance his own agenda. I wonder if the results they are looking to achieve are merely the taxing out of existence our wealthiest.
using that practice, the big task awaits – going on offense against Obama and his billion bucks of smear campaign meant to distract from his awful record.
The American philosophy teaches that the conception of how best to enjoy the benefits of the right to “Life” and to “the pursuit of Happiness” is a strictly personal matter for each Individual as Free Man–free in mind and spirit as well as in body and acting consistently with the duties of Individual Liberty-Responsibility, including chiefly the duty of respecting the equal rights (basically the constitutional rights) of others–to the exclusion of any coercion by government or by others.
The American philosophy asserts that Man’s right to property is a main, indispensable and inseparable part of the indivisible whole of Individual Liberty-Responsibility and the material mainstay of his unalienable right to “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
by Hamilton Abert Long
So people are trying to keep wealth…and the government is taking it away….but you’re saying it’s fraud to try to keep what you’ve earned that’s ALREADY been taxed? Geez, when did we officially become a communist country? The government should stop playing thief and get out of the way so that more people can earn wealth. The poor need opportunity, not for the government to take away from people who have earned money and done well. Coveting is wrong.