Stunning report from D.C. insiders reveals feds incurring too much debt! (No one else had the slightest idea)

Dan Calabrese

Apparently, there is some thought on the part of a certain group in Washington that federal spending is a bit out of hand. Hmm. You don’t suppose we have a problem here, do you?

Taking Washington absurdity to new heights, President Obama’s specially appointed “debt commission” has come back with a report stating – are you ready for this? – we’re incurring too much debt.

Dumbasses.

No. You don’t think. Really?

But in the absurd world of Governmentonia, no elected official (well, OK, Paul Ryan) can actually say what is as plain as the nose on your face to any even remotely engaged human being. So they task a cadre of retired government types to diligently study the numbers and come back with a report.

The Associated Press, of course, reports the findings as if they are news:

The nation’s total federal debt next year is expected to exceed $14 trillion – about $47,000 for every U.S. resident.

“This debt is like a cancer,” Bowles said in a sober presentation nonetheless lightened by humorous asides between him and Simpson. “It is truly going to destroy the country from within.”

Just so you know, $14 trillion is just about the nation’s entire gross domestic product. Every penny that can be raised by tax revenue is immediately swallowed up by three entitlement programs – Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Every penny. We borrow to fund everything else – from mohair subsidies and bridges to nowhere to the entire Defense Department Budget and Air Force One.

But I don’t know this because this dumbass “debt commission” said so. I know this because I have – how shall I put this? – looked at the budget.

(Actually, there is no budget, because congressional Democrats refuse to pass one this year out of abject fear that the political consequences of their insane spending will only intensify if they actually make their recklessness legal and official.)

I’ve looked at the most recent budget we have, which is now being kept alive in the form of continuing resolutions and “emergency” expenditures. And every member of Congress has looked at it too. Every member of Congress knows exactly what they are doing. President Obama knows exactly what he is doing, but he does it anyway because Democrats think governing consists of: 1) expanding the unionized federal work force to the greatest extent possible, preferably to 100 percent of the population; 2) finding creative new ways to transfer wealth from enterprising producers to dependent lemmings; and 3) suing everyone who has any wealth left.

We did all this and you’re still stinking rich? 1-800-CALL-SAM!

The debt commission is little more than political cover for the imperative to raise taxes, because that is what Obama really wants to do. He doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with the fact that the federal government is spending $3.6 trillion this year. He thinks there’s something wrong with the fact that Uncle Sam is taking in “only” $1.7 trillion and not soaking the entire $3.6 trillion from the U.S. taxpayer. Hey! There’s $14 trillion out there. Hand it over, you deadbeats! Your country needs it.

Since this column has chronicled many times Obama’s complete lack of understanding of economics, you will not be surprised to learn that he sees no reason such a usurpation should hinder the private sector’s ability to create wealth and opportunity. Just because the federal government confiscates an additional 15 percent of all the nation’s wealth doesn’t mean it should be any harder to employ Joe the Lunch Bucket Toter.

These people! These robber barons, derivatives traders, speculators, oil company executives, bond traders . . . OK, the president doesn’t exactly know what any of them do, but they have lots of money. Trust him.

But you already knew how blind to reality Washington was with respect to economics. Apparently it’s just as clueless about the politics of the matter. Erskine Bowles, the former Clinton chief of staff and now co-chair of the commission, offers the following blather concerning his group’s earth-shattering finding: “What we do is not so hard to figure out; it’s the political consequences of doing it that makes it really tough.”

Meanwhile, candidates across the nation are winning primaries as they promise to take a hatchet to federal spending, prompting sage, establishment media like the AP to speculate that these crazy extremists must be winning because their incumbent opponents criticized Glenn Beck.

There’s an entire wave sweeping this nation, demanding that Washington politicians get federal spending under control or face the political death penalty, and yet the Inside the Beltway crowd still panics over what will happen if they stop sending home federal money for bike trails and apple blight research.

By the way, for those luminaries who would throw themselves off tall buildings if they ever lost their seats, what do you suppose would be the political consequences of bankrupting the nation to the point of Soviet-style collapse?

Because, if that ever happened, I think there’s a chance they might even lose their access to the House gym.

Become Dan’s friend on Facebook.

Become a fan of The North Star National on Facebook.

To book Dan as a speaker, contact Lourdes Swarts at Speakers Access.


Share

7 Responses to “Stunning report from D.C. insiders reveals feds incurring too much debt! (No one else had the slightest idea)”

  • Number of economists in Congress? Zero!

  • Craig:

    A little history that you conveniently left out: The idea of a debt resolution commission originated with a group of Republican and Democratic senators, more than twenty of whom sponsored a bill that would have created such a commission. The bill included language that recommendations to reduce the debt would take effect unless 66 Sentaors voted them down. Then the lobbyists – both left and right – got involved and suddenly, the sponsors disappeared and the bill never made it to a committee. So, the President appointed his own commission – unfortunately toothless – to develop recommendations for resolving the debt. You make it sound like the commission idea originated with the President and is done with their work. They still will be making recommendaitons on debt reduction.
    To your credit, you are mostly correct in observing that the lions share of the budget goes to Social Security, Medicare and the Defense Dept. However, several ideas have surfaced to deal with the first two. Social Security can be made solvent again through such simple steps as raising the age to be able to start collecting by two years, by eliminating the cap on wages that are subject to FICA, and/or indexing future benefit adjustments to wage inflation instead of goods inflation. Similarly, Medicare can be made solvent by dumping the fee for service basis of reimbursement, and more tightly controlling the waste involved in ineffective treatments (yes, your term would be “rationing”), or by means testing benefits (would work for SS as well).
    The sad truth is that politically neither entitlement program can be significantly reduced, much less eliminated. Defense contractors have been crafty enough to put manufacturing or assemmby facilities in virtually every state in the union, so good luck in finding enough senators to vote to dump expensive and unnecessary weapons systems. Although ending the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would significantly reduce the current defense budgt – eventually, after “strategic replacement”. All other budget items, including the hated support for poor people, are not a large enough portion of the budget to make a dent in the debt or deficit if cut.
    So, yes, in order to balance the budget, taxes will have to be raised. (If you had a clue about macroeconomics you would understand.) And no, higher taxes done right do not hurt the economy. Again, macroeconomics. If you would like, however, to provide a historic example of when higher taxes negatively impacted GDP growth, employment levels or growth in real meadian household incomes, feel free. (It’s a trick…you can’t!)

  • I was honestly amazed with how well this blog was done, beautiful layout, professional writing, great job! :)

  • Major thanks for the article post. Will read on…

  • I can see that you are an expert at your field! I am starting a website soon, and your information will be very useful for me.. Thanks for all your help and wishing you all the success in your business.

  • Next time We learn a weblog, I really hope it does not fail myself being a whole lot as this one. I mean, I know it had been my substitute for learn, nonetheless I really considered you would have one thing fascinating to express. Just about all We listen to is really a few crying concerning something you may resolve if you happen to were not as well busy on the lookout for interest.

  • Magnificent weblog. All posts have a process to learn. Your hard work is very good and i enjoy you and wanting for some more informative posts.

Leave a Reply

Writers